“Records appraisal requires multi-disciplinary knowledge, theories, and experiences instead of rigidly applying any principle or doctrine.”
Records appraisal is an important process of selecting records with archival value for permanent retention. How exactly does an archivist appraise the records? Let two experienced Senior Assistant Archivists, Mr Manson Kwan Hon-ho and Mr Jack Lau Chik, tell you all about it.
Mr Kwan, who has been in the profession for more than 20 years, considers records appraisal an essential part of records management. But many people do not quite get the word “appraisal”. “Let’s put it this way, records appraisal is like household decluttering to discard the non-essentials and keep only those useful or valuable. Archivists select records with historical value from the massive government records for permanent retention.” The decision to “preserve” or “destroy” is never arbitrary, Mr Kwan stressed. Good records appraisal requires the following from the archivist:
To make a right decision, records appraisal requires multi-disciplinary knowledge, theories, and experiences instead of rigidly applying any principle or doctrine.
After selecting records for permanent retention, archivists will describe the records according to the General International Standard Archival Description [ISAD(G)] and provide such information in the online catalogue to facilitate public search. This process is called archival description, in which archivists have to study relevant documents for the detailed functions and organisational history of the transferring department in order to conduct the work properly and enable users to grasp the record’s contents accurately.
With today’s advanced technology, users can easily find loads of information through search engines. So why do archivists still have to dig out the historical context of the records? Mr Lau believes that even though technology facilitates the search process, human involvement remains indispensable. One of his experiences speak for itself. One time, he acquired numerous ship plans from a government department. These ship plans were untitled, and their background information was as scanty as hindering public search. After flipping through these ship plans, the archivists decided to use the ship names and models as titles, so that the online catalogue could identify the information and content of each record for users’ easy searching.
Mr Lau admits that challenges come up from time to time in tracing the historical context of the records for arrangement and description. When ambiguous abbreviations are used on the file covers, for example, archivists need to “solve the riddle” by tracing the history of the records creating department, and studying the content and relevant information thoroughly to get the meaning of such abbreviations.
Do you know the meaning of the abbreviation “SE” on the file cover of this record transferred from the Post Office?
Answer: Staff Relations/Employee Care & General Section
(Record ID: HKRS1398-1-1)
A record taken out of context is like a loose page fallen from a book. It does not make any sense even if the users get hold of it. This is why archivists have to sort out the historical background of records as a reference to facilitate users’ interpretation. In other words, an archivist is also a “guide” who scouts for the users in advance so that they can use and make the most of the records easily. This mission makes Mr Lau proud.
The proliferation of electronic records and their increasingly varying formats have brought enormous challenges to archivists in managing and preserving records. Both Mr Lau and Mr Kwan see the need to keep pace with the times by receiving relevant training, and collaborating with professionals in information technology and other fields so as to rise to the challenges arising from electronic records together. If you are interested in electronic records management, you may wish to read the feature article “ERKS / Continuity”.